wikistan » mccain

More ‘christianist conservatism’ from Sullivan

le saint — Wed, 20 Aug 2008 02:10:54 +0000

“Sullyboat” Sullivan SWEARS McCain received some good, ol’ fashioned habeus corpus at the Hanoi Hilton, but lacks the moral stones to denounce it today.

Poor McCain. He still thinks the wrong side won the war in Vietnam.

The truth, Andrew, you’ve become the Gorgeous George Galloway of the anybody-but-McCain Left.

No related posts.

Anbar Awakening successful because of local tribal leadership and American troops, but mostly American troops.

le saint — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:54:08 +0000

This chicken & egg argument about the Surge vs the Anbar Awakening, and how this is a major McCain gaffe is truly bizarre. No matter how desperately the Obama camp wants to steal this issue from McCain–and no matter how screechy the Obama fanboi sounds in the MSNBC message board–it is simply not factual to say the Awakening happened without American involvement! Technically, it may have happened before the first Surge brigades set foot in Anbar, but guess what? The tribal sheiks that provided momentum in the early, dark days of the Awakening were already working with American troops.

No related posts.

Americans want “change” at any cost. . .

le saint — Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:34:11 +0000

. . .which really is an immature reason to vote.� Do Americans really know anything about government and oversized bureaucracy?

Do Americans honestly believe that the Obama� brand will impart real change in Washington when the apparatus controlling his every appearance and scripting his every word already controls most of the (supposedly) despised Washington establishment?� Whether it’s Obama, Clinton, or even McCain, it’s� “Honey, which color scarf should our little Establishment wear today?”

So yeah, let’s vote for “Change”.

No related posts.