<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>wikistan &#187; hrc</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wikistan.com/tag/hrc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wikistan.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Looking forward to November</title>
		<link>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/06/04/looking-forward-to-november/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/06/04/looking-forward-to-november/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>le saint</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hillary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hrc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
<category>election</category><category>hillary</category><category>hrc</category><category>obama</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikistan.com/?p=841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal hits it succinctly here&#8211; the Democratics have essentially nominated a shiny bauble, not a worthy adversary.  Obama promises nothing otherwise his scant record would prove it.  And the supposed &#8217;safeguard&#8217; of the superdelegates failed to prevent it.


No related posts.


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Wall Street Journal<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121254834844844045.html?mod=opinion_main_review_and_outlooks"></a> hits it succinctly <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121254834844844045.html?mod=opinion_main_review_and_outlooks">here</a>&#8211; the Democratics have essentially nominated a shiny bauble, not a worthy adversary.  Obama promises nothing otherwise his scant record would prove it.  And the supposed &#8217;safeguard&#8217; of the superdelegates failed to prevent it.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/06/04/looking-forward-to-november/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Murdoch &#8211; Clinton &#8220;truce&#8221; becomes more clear</title>
		<link>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/02/26/murdoch-clinton-truce-becomes-more-clear/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/02/26/murdoch-clinton-truce-becomes-more-clear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>le saint</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foxnews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hillary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hillary clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hrc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rezko]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rupert murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times of london]]></category>
<category>barack obama</category><category>bho</category><category>foxnews</category><category>hillary</category><category>hillary clinton</category><category>hrc</category><category>obama</category><category>rezko</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>times</category><category>times of london</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikistan.com/2008/02/26/murdoch-clinton-truce-becomes-more-clear/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in 2006, conservative types were aghast at the notion of Hillary Clinton finding the softer side of Rupert Murdoch. Rightist icon Murdoch hosting a fundraiser for HRC?  Preposterous!
NewsCorp gallops to the rescue of a floundering Clinton campaign.


No related posts.


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in 2006, conservative types were aghast at the notion of Hillary Clinton finding the softer side of Rupert Murdoch. Rightist icon Murdoch hosting a <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/05/09/politics/main1600694.shtml" target="_blank">fundraiser</a> for HRC?  Preposterous!</p>
<p>NewsCorp gallops to the <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article3433485.ece?token=null&amp;offset=24">rescue</a> of a floundering Clinton campaign.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/02/26/murdoch-clinton-truce-becomes-more-clear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
