<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>wikistan &#187; election</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wikistan.com/tag/election/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wikistan.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Looking forward to November</title>
		<link>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/06/04/looking-forward-to-november/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/06/04/looking-forward-to-november/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>le saint</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hillary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hrc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
<category>election</category><category>hillary</category><category>hrc</category><category>obama</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikistan.com/?p=841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal hits it succinctly here&#8211; the Democratics have essentially nominated a shiny bauble, not a worthy adversary.  Obama promises nothing otherwise his scant record would prove it.  And the supposed &#8217;safeguard&#8217; of the superdelegates failed to prevent it.


No related posts.


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Wall Street Journal<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121254834844844045.html?mod=opinion_main_review_and_outlooks"></a> hits it succinctly <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121254834844844045.html?mod=opinion_main_review_and_outlooks">here</a>&#8211; the Democratics have essentially nominated a shiny bauble, not a worthy adversary.  Obama promises nothing otherwise his scant record would prove it.  And the supposed &#8217;safeguard&#8217; of the superdelegates failed to prevent it.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/06/04/looking-forward-to-november/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Listen closely</title>
		<link>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/05/19/listen-closely/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/05/19/listen-closely/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>le saint</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colombia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mcgovern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venezuela]]></category>
<category>barack obama</category><category>colombia</category><category>election</category><category>farc</category><category>iran</category><category>mcgovern</category><category>obama</category><category>politics</category><category>president</category><category>speech</category><category>venezuela</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikistan.com/?p=833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To the American Idol crowd, the typical Obama foreign policy stump speech might sound appealing.
To others, the same speech might sound terribly naive and immature.
To those appreciative to the nuances of political theatre, the same speech sounds like a press release from Socialist International.

Obama&#8217;s stance on foreign policy is not naive or immature, it&#8217;s socialist.  [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the American Idol crowd, the typical Obama foreign policy stump speech might sound appealing.</p>
<p>To others, the same speech might sound terribly naive and immature.</p>
<p>To those appreciative to the nuances of political theatre, the same speech sounds like a press release from Socialist International.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="355" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ew5qP2oPdtQ&amp;hl=en" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ew5qP2oPdtQ&amp;hl=en" wmode="transparent"></embed></object></p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s stance on foreign policy is not naive or immature, it&#8217;s <em>socialist</em>.  <em>This is what socialists sound like. </em>He&#8217;s not urging for more solidarity between the leadership of our nations.  He&#8217;s calling for enhancing the prospects of the Socialist International.  And he&#8217;s charging dumb Americans 20 bucks a pop to be part of it.  One hell of a campaign strategy.</p>
<p>No dialog between the US and these iddy biddy countries?  Even his own political machine has its own <a href="http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2008/05/media-ignores-rep-mcgovern-d-mass-was.html">Congressional </a>backchannel to talk with them (and their terror-loving proxies!).  For what reason?  To lend support to the opposition of the Colombian Free Trade deal. . . . an assistance welcomed by various regional socialist congresses. . . . Very nice indeed.</p>
<p>So, yeah, let&#8217;s have the that dialog, if only to covertly undermine US foreign policy.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/05/19/listen-closely/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Howard Dean &#8211; Top Asshole</title>
		<link>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/04/29/howard-dean-top-asshole/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/04/29/howard-dean-top-asshole/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>le saint</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asshole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[howard dean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
<category>asshole</category><category>democrat</category><category>election</category><category>howard dean</category><category>politics</category><category>president</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikistan.com/?p=821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Top &#8216;democratic&#8217; shows he&#8217;s still got what it takes to continually misrepresent simple spoken American language.


No related posts.


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top &#8216;democratic&#8217; shows he&#8217;s still got what it takes to continually <a href="http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/29779_New_DNC_Ad_Shows_US_Troops_Being_Blown_Up">misrepresent</a> simple spoken American language.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/04/29/howard-dean-top-asshole/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(Sigh, shaking head)</title>
		<link>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/03/02/sigh-shaking-head/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/03/02/sigh-shaking-head/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 22:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>le saint</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[levin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
<category>clark</category><category>clinton</category><category>election</category><category>election 2008</category><category>levin</category><category>obam</category><category>president</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikistan.com/2008/03/02/sigh-shaking-head/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to go on the road for a couple of days, but here&#8217;s a goody to chew on:
Election 2004 - The nation is at war. The &#8220;right kind&#8221; of military experience is needed in order to lead the nation through this troubling time. We don&#8217;t need a President &#8220;renting a flight suit&#8221; just to [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to go on the road for a couple of days, but here&#8217;s a goody to chew on:</p>
<p><strong>Election 2004 </strong>- The nation is at war. The &#8220;<a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20040121-1443-clark.html" target="_blank">right</a> <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/president/2004-02-12-clark-kerry_x.htm" target="_blank">kind</a>&#8221; of military experience is needed in order to lead the nation through this troubling time. We don&#8217;t need a President &#8220;<a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20040121-1443-clark.html" target="_blank">renting a flight suit</a>&#8221; just to dress up in military attire (even though said President was actually a former military pilot). . . . The Democratic candidate <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/president/2004-02-05-kerry_x.htm" target="_blank">must</a> have some military experience.</p>
<p><strong>Election 2008 </strong>- <span class="blog_title">The nation is at war.  Military experience just isn&#8217;t that important in a candidate.  Hell, even John McCain doesn&#8217;t have the right kind of </span><a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NjA3NTQ5ZDQ1ZmUwYWM5MWU0YTA2ZDkzZTdmYzA3YzY="><span class="blog_title">military experience</span></a><span class="blog_title"> to be President.</span></p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/03/02/sigh-shaking-head/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Agreeing with Krugman?</title>
		<link>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/02/11/agreeing-with-krugman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/02/11/agreeing-with-krugman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>le saint</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[krugman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul krugman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
<category>bush</category><category>election</category><category>krugman</category><category>obama</category><category>paul krugman</category><category>politics</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikistan.com/2008/02/11/agreeing-with-krugman/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only for a split second, though, on the Cult of Obama:
 I won’t try for fake evenhandedness here: most of the venom I see is coming from supporters of Mr. Obama, who want their hero or nobody. I’m not the first to point out that the Obama campaign seems dangerously close to becoming a cult [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only for a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/11/opinion/11krugman.html?ex=1360472400&amp;en=5f0ee81a0e142005&amp;ei=5124&amp;partner=permalink&amp;exprod=permalink">split second</a>, though, on the Cult of Obama:</p>
<blockquote><p> I won’t try for fake evenhandedness here: most of the venom I see is coming from supporters of Mr. Obama, who want their hero or nobody. I’m not the first to point out that the Obama campaign seems dangerously close to becoming a cult of personality.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ok, it must be so obvious that even Krugman concedes it.  But there&#8217;s more:</p>
<blockquote><p>We’ve already had that from the Bush administration — remember Operation Flight Suit? We really don’t want to go there again.</p></blockquote>
<p>. .&lt;<em>groan</em>&gt;. Well, it was brief, but I should have predicted that.  Was Krugman referring to the &#8220;Mission Accomplished&#8221; episode, where Bush-haters lent massive inertia to a crudely juxtaposed misrepresentation of Bush&#8217;s flight deck speech?   Or is he insinuating that there is a Bush equivalent to the Obama cult?</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/02/11/agreeing-with-krugman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Change. Or else.</title>
		<link>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/02/03/change-or-else/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/02/03/change-or-else/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 16:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>le saint</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hillary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marxism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
<category>clinton</category><category>crisis</category><category>election</category><category>health</category><category>health insurance</category><category>hillary</category><category>marxism</category><category>obama</category><category>politics</category><category>president</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikistan.com/2008/02/03/change-or-else/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hoping to appeal to progressives, liberals, socialists, and whole-grained fascists across America, Hillary Clinton suggests that she would be open to the idea of garnishing the wages of American workers who refuse to buy mandated health insurance
The New York senator has criticized presidential rival Barack Obama for pushing a health plan that would not require [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoping to appeal to progressives, liberals, socialists, and whole-grained fascists across America, Hillary Clinton suggests that she would be open to the idea of <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080203/ap_on_el_pr/campaign_rdp;_ylt=AttcwJj1Qzyv1_PNk8yr8USs0NUE">garnishing</a> the wages of American workers who refuse to buy mandated health insurance</p>
<blockquote><p>The New York senator has criticized presidential rival Barack Obama for pushing a health plan that would not require universal coverage. Clinton has not always specified the enforcement measures she would embrace, but when pressed on ABC&#8217;s &#8220;This Week,&#8221; she said: &#8220;I think there are a number of mechanisms&#8221; that are possible, including &#8220;going after people&#8217;s wages, automatic enrollment.&#8221;</p>
<p>Clinton said such measures would apply only to workers who can afford health coverage but refuse to buy it, which puts undue pressure on hospitals and emergency rooms. With her proposals for subsidies, she said, &#8220;it will be affordable for everyone.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>This is beyond insane.  Have at it, you Marxist ass-hats.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/02/03/change-or-else/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Americans want &#8220;change&#8221; at any cost. . .</title>
		<link>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/01/31/americans-want-change-at-any-cost/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/01/31/americans-want-change-at-any-cost/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>le saint</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
<category>clinton</category><category>election</category><category>mccain</category><category>obama</category><category>politics</category><category>president</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikistan.com/2008/01/31/americans-want-change-at-any-cost/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[. . .which really is an immature reason to vote.  Do Americans really know anything about government and oversized bureaucracy?
Do Americans honestly believe that the Obama™ brand will impart real change in Washington when the apparatus controlling his every appearance and scripting his every word already controls most of the (supposedly) despised Washington establishment?  Whether [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>. . .which really is an immature <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080131/ap_on_el_pr/ap_yahoo_poll_change;_ylt=AnX9T3V_NlzIXRTfGiTGiNGs0NUE">reason</a> to vote.  Do Americans really know anything about government and oversized bureaucracy?</p>
<p>Do Americans honestly believe that the Obama™ brand will impart real change in Washington when the apparatus controlling his every appearance and scripting his every word already controls most of the (supposedly) despised Washington establishment?  Whether it&#8217;s Obama, Clinton, or even McCain, it&#8217;s  &#8220;Honey, which color scarf should our little Establishment wear today?&#8221;</p>
<p>So yeah, let&#8217;s vote for &#8220;Change&#8221;.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/01/31/americans-want-change-at-any-cost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hitchens on identity politics</title>
		<link>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/01/21/hitchens-on-identity-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/01/21/hitchens-on-identity-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 02:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>le saint</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race]]></category>
<category>2008</category><category>clinton</category><category>election</category><category>hitchens</category><category>identity</category><category>obama</category><category>politics</category><category>president</category><category>race</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikistan.com/2008/01/21/hitchens-on-identity-politics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The problem is that Sen. Obama wants us to transcend something at the same time he implicitly asks us to give that same something as a reason to vote for him. I must say that the lyricism with which he does this has double and triple the charm of Mrs. Clinton&#8217;s heavily-scripted trudge through the [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article_print/SB120062413171299477.html">problem</a> is that Sen. Obama wants us to transcend something at the same time he implicitly asks us to give that same something as a reason to vote for him. I must say that the lyricism with which he does this has double and triple the charm of Mrs. Clinton&#8217;s heavily-scripted trudge through the landscape, but the irony is still the same.&#8221;</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wikistan.com/2008/01/21/hitchens-on-identity-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
