Comments on: Suing your way to forced accomodation http://www.wikistan.com/2008/11/20/suing-your-way-to-forced-accomodation/ Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:53:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: Vinman http://www.wikistan.com/2008/11/20/suing-your-way-to-forced-accomodation/comment-page-1/#comment-36613 Vinman Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:10:15 +0000 http://www.wikistan.com/?p=1567#comment-36613 No, but their caving could give dumbasses the misconception that eHarmony was on the wrong side of some kind of imaginary discrimination. I asked for a hot dog at BK, but they don't make them. Was I denied? Um, no, because I could still purchase another menu item, even though I have no use for "chicken fries". No, but their caving could give dumbasses the misconception that eHarmony was on the wrong side of some kind of imaginary discrimination.

I asked for a hot dog at BK, but they don’t make them. Was I denied? Um, no, because I could still purchase another menu item, even though I have no use for “chicken fries”.

]]> By: chris http://www.wikistan.com/2008/11/20/suing-your-way-to-forced-accomodation/comment-page-1/#comment-36612 chris Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:47:33 +0000 http://www.wikistan.com/?p=1567#comment-36612 They weren't forced to do so. Those chose to do so per a settlement. No one has mandated said man on man action, unfortunately. If you're a gay, aren't you denied access to the dating service by not having the choice of searching for other dudes? Thusly, being denied access to the dating service? They weren’t forced to do so. Those chose to do so per a settlement. No one has mandated said man on man action, unfortunately.

If you’re a gay, aren’t you denied access to the dating service by not having the choice of searching for other dudes? Thusly, being denied access to the dating service?

]]> By: Vinman http://www.wikistan.com/2008/11/20/suing-your-way-to-forced-accomodation/comment-page-1/#comment-36553 Vinman Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:42:20 +0000 http://www.wikistan.com/?p=1567#comment-36553 Um, no, But that's not the same. Presumably, in your scenario, the establishment serves a product that could be enjoyed by both whites and blacks. eHarmony broke no laws. They didn't refuse anybody any service, which is different than not providing a service their accuser desired. . .Now they are being forced to provide it. Do you think it's right that eHarmony should be FORCED to set up a gay dating service? Um, no, But that’s not the same. Presumably, in your scenario, the establishment serves a product that could be enjoyed by both whites and blacks.

eHarmony broke no laws. They didn’t refuse anybody any service, which is different than not providing a service their accuser desired. . .Now they are being forced to provide it.

Do you think it’s right that eHarmony should be FORCED to set up a gay dating service?

]]> By: chris http://www.wikistan.com/2008/11/20/suing-your-way-to-forced-accomodation/comment-page-1/#comment-36545 chris Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:22:22 +0000 http://www.wikistan.com/?p=1567#comment-36545 "Can no private enterprise cater to an exclusive demographic?" Is it cool to cater to white folks and put up a sign that says "no blacks allowed"? “Can no private enterprise cater to an exclusive demographic?”

Is it cool to cater to white folks and put up a sign that says “no blacks allowed”?

]]>